Also, “Gentlemen” (obviously using that term loosely), I would suggest you reread your own comments. I would never dream of mocking, laughing at, or trying to otherwise demean someone in the way that you have done. I will respond succinctly to those who are being Rude. As her heir, re: all her writings, I chose not to publish the journals after they started showing up. I could have copyrighted them and made money off of them, had I wanted to do so. Her publisher wanted me to do that. I did not, as I felt it would be disrespectful of me to do so after she told me what her wishes were.

Also, re: these teachings are not for everyone, was in reference to personal teachings in the journal. Not His public teachings, as published by several authors.

Thank You!
Judy Amlin.

Please read my response to Nathan Whitaker.

This is Judy Amlin. I am not nor have I ever claimed “ownership” of the journals. I have only expressed what my mother told me. Her reasoning was that “these teachings are not for everyone”. At this stage, I have decided that, since they have become so widespread, that there is nothing more that I can do. Please don’t project your ideas onto me. I was only trying to do what my beloved mother asked me to do. Also, get a grip on that ego.

Wisdom teachings to be kept private? On what basis? Shouldn’t humanity have access?

Sri Nisagardatta Maharaj accepted all into his home that wished to learn from him. Read that sentence again.

Now an heir of one of his disciples claims ownership? As Shi Va said I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. It is a contradiction of the teachings to keep them private.

With that fact in mind I am using these teaching for the benefit of all beings.

It is said in bhagavad gita that Man has no claim over the fruits of his labour. Here we have a woman who claims the fruits of her mother’s labour.I dont know whether to laugh or cry.
Spiritual teaching belongs to humanity not to individuals,
Why do you deny us your mothers gift to this world?