<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Psychology of Mans Possible Evolution	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.holybooks.com/the-psychology-of-mans-possible-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.holybooks.com/the-psychology-of-mans-possible-evolution/</link>
	<description>Download the Bible, The Holy Quran, The Mahabharata and thousands of free pdf ebooks on buddhism, meditation etc. Read the reviews and download the free PDF e-books.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 23:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Hale		</title>
		<link>https://www.holybooks.com/the-psychology-of-mans-possible-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-75539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Hale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://holybooks.com/?p=474#comment-75539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, by all reasonable estimates, this work belongs in the public domain.  Is that correct?

Hans seems astute to what is in copyright domain, and out.  This is proven when two of Ouspensky&#039;s books, once available in 2010, were re-published later and not now available, ref.
 
1) A New Model of the Universe, and,

2) In Search of the Miraculous,

both now removed for download, as indicated.


So, is it reasonable to say that &#039;POMPE&#039; is secure as a free being in the greater public domain?

Steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, by all reasonable estimates, this work belongs in the public domain.  Is that correct?</p>
<p>Hans seems astute to what is in copyright domain, and out.  This is proven when two of Ouspensky&#8217;s books, once available in 2010, were re-published later and not now available, ref.</p>
<p>1) A New Model of the Universe, and,</p>
<p>2) In Search of the Miraculous,</p>
<p>both now removed for download, as indicated.</p>
<p>So, is it reasonable to say that &#8216;POMPE&#8217; is secure as a free being in the greater public domain?</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Hale		</title>
		<link>https://www.holybooks.com/the-psychology-of-mans-possible-evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-75375</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Hale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://holybooks.com/?p=474#comment-75375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Someone stated recently when I offered that this book was available from Holy Books the following:


&quot;Unfortunately, O.&#039;s wife registered it after his death and it still belongs to descendants via inheritance. Thus any pdf of it is illegal.&quot;


How he could know this baffles me because it has been available since June 2010, and I first downloaded it back then.  No new edition seen, as far as I know.

Steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone stated recently when I offered that this book was available from Holy Books the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, O.&#8217;s wife registered it after his death and it still belongs to descendants via inheritance. Thus any pdf of it is illegal.&#8221;</p>
<p>How he could know this baffles me because it has been available since June 2010, and I first downloaded it back then.  No new edition seen, as far as I know.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
